Reshared post from +Ani ta
??????? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ?????
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
Reshared post from +Ani ta
??????? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ?????
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
Reshared post from +????? ?
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
Reshared post from +GPlus Business Italia
I più discussi sui social networkDevo aggiungere altro?
via: https://plus.google.com/u/0/107665939201638457855/posts/674VQZFnjNi
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
via +Helga Velroyen
Reshared post from +Linda Kay Torres
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
Reshared post from +Lewna Tsuki
Lmfao!
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
Reshared post from +Tessie L’Amour
Art is not constrained by what I may think it is#Artis #moanlisa #antiart
Inspired by +Moan Lisa's Art Akademie™, though I reject the idea of an assignment.
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
It is time for me to promote my wife's site and book for a bit…
Embedded Link
MAKE-UP ACCESS. Welcome
to Make-up Access!
Empowering you to look and feel great!
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
Reshared post from +Mike Searle
This is totally accurate. The people I'm meeting on +Google+ are people that I find interesting because of our shared passions.
Embedded Link
I “get” Google+ Now and Apparently so do Others (Facebook May Have a Problem)
I liked the service since day 1. Within a week I was almost ignoring Facebook. But it wasn’t until about a week ago that I really understood why it was that I checked Google+ more religiously…
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
Watch out! He is armed!
Reshared post from +Annika O’Brien
A present from my friend +martin shervington .
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
Reshared post from +Neil Smith
Another good post from Bruce Schneier on what security systems should really be about: cost-benefit ratios. What's the best way to exert our effort to actually make us safer?Why do otherwise rational people think it's a good idea to profile people at airports? Recently, neuroscientist and best-selling author Sam Harris related a story of an elderly couple being given the twice-over by the TSA, pointed out how these two were obviously not a threat, and recommended that the TSA focus on the actual threat: "Muslims, or anyone who looks like he or she could conceivably be Muslim."
This is a bad idea. It doesn’t make us any safer — and it actually puts us all at risk.
The right way to look at security is in terms of cost-benefit trade-offs. If adding profiling to airport checkpoints allowed us to detect more threats at a lower cost, than we should implement it. If it didn't, we'd be foolish to do so. Sometimes profiling works. Consider a sheep in a meadow, happily munching on grass. When he spies a wolf, he's going to judge that individual wolf based on a bunch of assumptions related to the past behavior of its species. In short, that sheep is going to profile…and then run away. This makes perfect sense, and is why evolution produced sheep — and other animals — that react this way. But this sort of profiling doesn't work with humans at airports, for several reasons.
Embedded Link
Schneier on Security: The Trouble with Airport Profiling
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.